Here is my tribute to 1982.
In two months, it will be 2012. 30 years ago, 1982 was undoubtedly the most prolific year for SF movies. Sure, a Star Wars movie wasn't released that year, but 1982 outshines any other year in terms of quantity and quality of great SF movies. Here are the best ones, in my opinion.
![]() The Final Cut is the definitive version of this movie, since it fixes some glitches and continuity errors, as well as introducing a few added visuals that didn't make it through editing before. The original, theatrical release was fun, I guess, but despite the appeal of the Maltese Falcon-style narration, it really talks down to the audience by having Deckard's character explaining everything and spelling everything out. Blade Runner works so much better as a dark, silent movie, in which the viewer is emotionally distanced from the protagonist, Rick Deckard, leaving the viewer to ponder the ultimate question, "What does it mean to be human?" Ridley Scott is planning to make a sequel, and I am hesitant to get my hopes up about it. Blade Runner depicts a 1982 interpretation of what the year 2019 will be like, complete with noisy neon signs, bulky electronics, and CRT monitors. The year 2019 is only eight years away, and it is unlikely we will be discovering wormholes and colonizing the stars as the movie alludes to, especially not since the terrible Obama Administration has all but demolished NASA. So, it would be best if the sequel continues the '80s image of the 21st century, without trying for "realism" like cell phones and flat panel LCD monitors. If a sequel will be made, here's an idea I had once while having a bit of insomnia: So we know that Replicants are banned on Earth, but what about the offworld colonies? Is everything swell on those colonies? Wouldn't it be intriguing if the "golden land of opportunity and adventure" turns out to be a sham, and life in the colonies really sucks for those who believed the Shimada-Dominguez propaganda? Why not have a whole ton of Replicant problems in the colonies, contributing to the reason why Replicants are banned on Earth? Perhaps the setting for this sequel could be on such a colony. Are they colony planets? Or Gundam-type colony cylinders? Perhaps a premise like that would be detached enough from the original movie and still appeal to the normaltards out there. | ||
![]() It is a miracle that this movie even came together the way it did, with different computer animation studios each doing separate sequences of the film and Steven Lisberger fitting them all together. There were so many challenges. For example, the people were filmed and the frames of the film were rotoscoped (painted over) by a team in Korea. When they put the movie back together from receiving the film as a disorganized mess, the discoloring of the people made the frames seem to flicker. Sound effects were added to these visual flickers, adding to the other-worldly computer-like feel to the movie. The Syd Mead designs are fantastic. As much as I enjoyed the sequel, Tron Legacy, it still didn't quite have the same magic as the original. And as much as I like Daft Punk, they should have made the soundtrack a lot more electronic. The soundtrack to the orignal film by Wendy Carlos did a much better job at capturing the essence of a virtual world, I think. | ||
![]() It doesn't matter to me how much Kirsty Alley wrecks herself and gains all that weight these days. To me, she'll always be that hot Vulcan/Romulan chick in The Wrath of Khan. I really wish her commitment to doing Cheers could have allowed her to reappear in the following two Star Trek films, since the actress who replaces her role as Saavik just doesn't even come close to Alley's appeal as both an actress and a hot chick. | ||
![]() OK, so technically this movie was released in 1981, but it wasn't released in the USA until '82. So according to my America-centric mind, I consider this an '82 movie. Mel Gibson was the quintessential bad-ass of the '80s, especially in this movie. It's not necessary to see the first movie, Mad Max, to understand this film. While it introduces Max's character and how his wife is killed and also how he gets his bad-ass Interceptor car, The Road Warrior is a fantasic, post-apocalyptic film that stands on its own. (Actually, I really should get around to watching Beyond Thunderdome someday...) | ||
![]() This movie is the perfect blending of science fiction, mystery, and horror. Based on the short story Who Goes There? by John W. Cambell Jr., this movie was more than a mere remake of the original 1950's Frankenstein-esque creature movie since it brings back elements of the original story, namely the fact that the alien can assume any living creature, that were ignored in the old black & white movie. They recently made a sort of prequel movie to The Thing, but from what I gather, it doesn't do any real justice to John Carpenter's 1982 masterpiece. Watch the documentary on the DVD and you'll see the intensive labor invested into making this wretched alien become real, often with only one shot at filming to make it work. Now that movies are inundated with computer graphics, there is no more labor of love that shines through the silver screen like this movie does. | ||
![]() The Dark Crystal is another one-of-a-kind movie that you will never see anything like again. The entire movie is puppetry, and the story is so very other-worldly. The vulture-like Skeksis and the sloth-like Mystics live a symbiotic life, being polar opposites of evil and compassion respectively. Both are dying out, so it is up to a boy named Jen to try to repair the Dark Crystal and save the world. The movie is incredible, with fascinating creatures. Particularly cool, I thought, were the Landstriders on which Jen and Kira rode. These creatures were puppeteers walking on all fours with stilts. That seems rather dangerous to me, especially considering how clumsy I am. When I was a child, Kira's pet Fizzgig was particularly endearing, both vicious-looking and adorable at the same time. | ||
![]() Don't be fooled about what you've read on somethingawful.com about furries. Most are somewhat normal people, and this movie is a prime example of what a so-called "furry" story is about: an anthropomorphic animal adventure. But regardless of the animals in this movie; this movie is a pure science fiction/fantasy movie full of magic, action, sowrdfighting, blood, murder, and betrayal. Yes, there is a song, but it's a beautiful lullaby Mrs. Brisbee sings to her son, so it fits well with the movie. I think children need to see movies like this; not movies about stupid dancing penguins. This is another movie that scared me a bit when I saw it in the theaters as a child. The Great Owl was fearsome, voiced by John Carradine. Also, a young Wil Wheaton plays one of the mouse children, before he went on to star in Stand By Me and Star Trek: The Next Generation. I love Wil Wheaton. What I hate is the dumb-looking artwork on this movie's DVD cover, as they try to make the movie look adorable. They gave Mrs. Brisbee long eyelashes even! Stupid. When I first showed the DVD to my wife, she was like, "Ugh, what's this?" I told her to not be misled by the crappy artwork. This is a seriously intelligent movie. | ||
![]() That said, this movie really speaks to the geeks of my generation. The boys playing a game of Dungeons and Dragons, the scene where Elliot is teaching E.T. the names of his Star Wars action figures, big brother Michael's Space Invaders shirt and his impersonation of Yoda, all sorts of neat stuff like that makes this movie charming. The kids are all great actors, and the scene with the mom reading Peter Pan to Gertie is so beautiful. What I don't get is that the novel says that Elliot was feeding M&Ms candy to E.T., yet in the movie he was giving him Reeces Pieces. I was sad about this, because I hated peanut butter as a kid. I still just don't like it. So maybe E.T. just nearly died from a peanut allergy? Oh yeah, and unlike the updated version of Blade Runner, the updated version of E.T. was dumb, especially how Spielberg replaced the guns in the hands of the federal agents with walkie talkies. That was just ridiculous, and it reeked of George Lucas in the wake of the Star Wars "Special Editions." I'm all for added scenes and director's cuts, but while I liked the additional scenes to the movie, the walkie talkie thing ruined it for me. | ||
![]() Anyhow, the fascinating, science fiction element to this film was that the Firefox plane can be partially controlled via a neuralink. The plane also can fly at Mach 6 and is invisible to radar, which was still an unknown since the Stealth had yet to be released to the public in 1982. Heck, I remember putting together a plastic model of a conceptual prototype of the Stealth fighter in the '80s because at the time, nobody knew what it would look like. The concept of thought control weaponry seems very futuristic, yet this is an example of science fiction we are starting to see come to life in reality.
| ![]()
| ![]()
|
Go back to the "Greg's Life" Table of Contents
"I don't think I'm alone when I say I'd like to see more and more planets fall under the ruthless domination of our solar system." ---Jack Handey
mail: greg -atsign- stevethefish -dot- net